| Name |
Comments |
| 2650) |
|
| healpisee |
| hdfhdrhdb(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Denmark |
|
Even though Associate Certification are a great way to begin, completing the Bachelors reveals many good opportunities to various occupations, there are numerous internet Bachelor Diploma Programs available from institutions like The University of Phoenix, Intercontinental University Online and Kaplan. Another thing is that many brick and mortar institutions offer Online types of their degree programs but normally for a extensively higher payment than the companies that specialize in online degree plans.
|
| 2649) |
|
| Ava_New_Jersey |
| ha(dot)g(dot)g(dot)ersto(dot)n(dot)p(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for “technology skew” - or what ever it was….
|
| 2648) |
|
| Taylor_Florida |
| h(dot)agg(dot)er(dot)s(dot)t(dot)onpe(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.)
|
| 2647) |
|
| Serenity_Arizona |
| h(dot)ag(dot)ge(dot)r(dot)st(dot)o(dot)np(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.
|
| 2646) |
|
| Camila_South_Carolina |
| h(dot)ag(dot)ger(dot)ston(dot)pe(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.
|
| 2645) |
|
| Trinity_Indiana |
| haggerst(dot)o(dot)n(dot)p(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.
|
| 2644) |
|
| Taylor_Oklahoma |
| ha(dot)gg(dot)er(dot)ston(dot)pe(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
That’s fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn’t matter.
|
| 2643) |
|
| qhcpegigpj |
| swemskigdvzmpjmpmk(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: America |
|
long year acer trends show only 001 more acelenolysunci topics now pr43 in 2012
|
| 2642) |
|
| Sofia_Ohio |
| ha(dot)g(dot)g(dot)er(dot)s(dot)t(dot)o(dot)n(dot)pe(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate – McLame – would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.
|
| 2641) |
|
| Alexa_Georgia |
| hag(dot)g(dot)ers(dot)to(dot)n(dot)per(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.
|
| 2640) |
|
| Alexandra_Wisconsin |
| ha(dot)gg(dot)e(dot)r(dot)s(dot)to(dot)n(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.
|
| 2639) |
|
| Gabrielle_Delaware |
| hag(dot)ger(dot)st(dot)o(dot)n(dot)per(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.
|
| 2638) |
|
| cewvlxnqtx |
| swemskigdvzmpjmpmk(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: United States |
|
long year acer trends show only 001 more acelenolysunci topics now pr59 in 2012
|
| 2637) |
|
| Trinity_New_Hampshire |
| h(dot)agg(dot)er(dot)sto(dot)np(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :)
|
| 2636) |
|
| Savannah_Alabama |
| ha(dot)gge(dot)rs(dot)t(dot)on(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*)
|
| 2635) |
|
| Brianna_Indiana |
| ha(dot)gg(dot)e(dot)rsto(dot)np(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.
|
| 2634) |
|
| Grace_Kentucky |
| h(dot)ag(dot)ger(dot)s(dot)t(dot)o(dot)npe(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.
|
| 2633) |
|
| Ariana_Kentucky |
| hag(dot)g(dot)e(dot)rst(dot)on(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.
|
| 2632) |
|
| Olivia_Illinois |
| h(dot)agg(dot)erstonper(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.
|
| 2631) |
|
| Amelia_Minnesota |
| ha(dot)g(dot)g(dot)er(dot)st(dot)o(dot)n(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate – McLame – would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.
|
| 2630) |
|
| Ella_Delaware |
| ha(dot)gg(dot)erst(dot)o(dot)n(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I’m not sure what you have against “The Five”. I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.
|
| 2629) |
|
| Alyssa_Texas |
| h(dot)agge(dot)r(dot)s(dot)to(dot)n(dot)pe(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.
|
| 2628) |
|
| Abigail_South_Dakota |
| hagge(dot)rs(dot)tonp(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.
|
| 2627) |
|
| Katherine_Michigan |
| hagge(dot)rstonper(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.)
|
| 2626) |
|
| Anna_Illinois |
| hag(dot)ger(dot)stonp(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" — I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you — and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.
|
| 2625) |
|
| Genesis_Colorado |
| h(dot)ag(dot)ge(dot)r(dot)st(dot)on(dot)p(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?
|
| 2624) |
|
| Maya_Maryland |
| hag(dot)g(dot)e(dot)rsto(dot)np(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.
|
| 2623) |
|
| Zoe_North_Carolina |
| hagger(dot)st(dot)onp(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.
|
| 2622) |
|
| Brooklyn_Kentucky |
| h(dot)a(dot)gg(dot)e(dot)rst(dot)o(dot)n(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list…..perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!
|
| 2621) |
|
| Mia_Idaho |
| h(dot)ag(dot)gerst(dot)onp(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.
|